← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/2980/2023dismissed

M.Alexander v. The Inspector Of Police

2023-02-15Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.2980 of 2023 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15/02/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP(MD). No.2980 of 2023 M.Alexander ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Courtallam Police Station, Tenkasi District.

(Crime No.13/2023). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Dinesh K, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.13/2023 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner /A1 who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 21.01.2023 for the offences under sections 294(b),307 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.13 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioner along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language assaulted him and also threatened with dire consequences, hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.2980 of 2023 submit that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against him. He would further submit that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 21.01.2023, hence he seeks bail.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent would submit that due to previous enmity the petitioner along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language assaulted him and also threatened with dire consequences, hence he objected to grant bail to the petitioner. He would further submit that injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioner is having ten previous cases.

5. Heard. Perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

6. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that ten previous cases are pending against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Hence the petition stands dismissed for the present. sd/- 15/02/2023 / TRUE COPY / /02/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

AAV TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, PALAYAMKOTTAI.

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE COURTALLAM POLICE STATION, TENKASI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.2980 of 2023 Date :15/02/2023 VA/BUC/SAR-1/21.02.2023/2P/4C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2