D. Rajasekar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL MP(MD) No.5725 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8593 of 2016 1 D. RAJASEKAR 2 DHANDAPANI 3 KAMALA ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 194 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on them in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8593 of 2016 dated 06.06.2016 Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S D.VENKATESH, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:- Heard both sides.

2. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the petitioners are complying with the condition regularly.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioners is modified to the effect that the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police as and when required.

sd/- 19/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI.

2. THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANI TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. C.C. to M/S D.VENKATESH Advocate SR.No. 37803

ORDER

IN CRL MP(MD) No.5725 of 2016 IN CRL OP(MD) No.8593 of 2016 Date :19/07/2016 AM TE/DB/SAR-III : 21/07/2016 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/