S. Maheswaran v. The State Of Tamilnadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.03.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI 1.Er.S.Maheswaran 2.Er.S.Sharmila 3.Er.C.Peria Thirumal 4.Er.M.Balaji 5.Er.Ganeshkumar 6.K.Sangeetha 7.K.Sathasivam 8.Er.P.Arivzhagan 9.Er.C.Karthikkumar 10.Er.R.Rajkumar 11.Er.A.Soundrarajan 12.Er.P.Manikandan 13.Er.M.Sundharapandi 14.Er.M.S.Mohammed Shagul Hameedraja 15.Er.V.Mahalakshmi 16.S.Naganathan 17.Er.V.Mahalakshmi 18.Er.G.Chelvakumar 19.Er.M.Ramanathan 20.Er.T.P.Rajeswari 21.Er.A.Yahini 22.Er.A.V.Ashok Pandian 23.Er.M.Azhagenthiran 24.Er.S.Pon Murali 25.Er.A.Perumalsamy 26.Er.P.Gayathri 27.Er.P.Rajapandi 1/6
28.Er.S.Jeganathan 29.Er.P.Sathish Ajay 30.Er.P.T.Rangarajan 31.Er.D.Priya 32.K.Selvaganapathy 33.V.Suresh 34.M.Venkatesh 35.P.Ramalingam 36.M.Velayutham 37.Er.M.Ravichandran 38.Er.S.Suresh 39.Er.S.C.Vadivelkumaran 40.S.Balakrishan 41.V.Rameshkumar 42.Er.P.Suresh 43.Er.S.Senthilkumar 44.Er.K.Babu Saravanan 45.Er.C.Poonkodi 46.Er.R.Vidya 47.Er.M.Yogavel 48.Er.A.Benazeer Fathima 49.Er.P.Arunadevi 50.S.Yashmeen Sulthana Barveen 51.M.Venkatesh 52.A.Arun Prakash 53.P.Mohamed Althaf 54.K.Raja 55.S.Siva Nanthini 56.Er.M.Arivezhil 57.Er.K.Vairamuthu 58.Er.T.Selvan 59.Er.R.Marikani 60.Er.K.Geetha 61.Er.R.Jose Antony Syril 62.Er.M.Mathan Kumar 63.Er.T.Vishnuvardhan 64.Er.T.Nagaraja 65.Er.J.Jemi Shalini 66Er.M.Balaganesh 2/6
67.Er.T.S.Rajeshkumar 68.Er.M.Kalai Kannadasan 69.Er.K.Krishnakumar 70.Er.S.Raja 71.Er.M.Sheik Mohamed 72.Er.M.Palavesam 73.Er.F.Alfin Ashmita 74.Er.P.Rajendran 75.Er.P.Saravanan 76.Er.P.Lavanya 77.Er.G.Krishnakumar 78.Er.J.Dominic Amalesh 79.Er.A.R.Venodkumar 80.Er.P.Prem Sankar, 81.Er.K.S.Vignesh 82.Er.M.Paramasivam : Appellants Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.
2.The Director of General, Highways Department, Guindy, Chennai.
3.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai.
4.N.Indhumathi 5.S.Thirumalai Dhathachari 6.S.S.V.S.Raja 7.P.Philip Prabakaran 8.P.Balajisingh 3/6
9.V.Ramamoorthy 10.K.Tholkapian : Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent to set aside the common order passed in W.P(MD)No.7634 of 2020 dated 30.11.2022. For Appellants : Mr.Raja Karthikeyan For Respondents : Mr.Veerakathiravan Addl. Advocate General assisted by Mr.S.P.Maharajan Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 to R3 *** COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) The question sought to be raised in this writ appeal is covered by the Judgment of this Court in D.Aravinda vs. The Government of Tamil Nadu reported in CDJ 2009 MHC 3933.
2.From the reading of the above said Judgment of the learned Single Judge of this Court, we find that the Rule position has been correctly interpreted and it has been found that the Direct Recruits cannot have grievance when the cases of the promotees are concerned. The Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A(MD)Nos.1334 and 1335 of 2009, has upheld the promotion 4/6
orders passed relying upon the Judgment of the D.Aravindan's case. We, therefore, see no need to revisit the Rule position which will create further confusion.
3.Hence, this writ appeal fails and the same is dismissed. No costs. [R.S.M..,J] (L.V.G.,J] skn 17.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes To 1.The Secretary, Highways and Minor Ports Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.
2.The Director of General, Highways Department, Guindy, Chennai.
3.The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Chennai.
5/6
R.SUBRAMANIAN.,J.
AND L.VICTORIA GOWRI.,J.
skn 17.03.2023.
6/6