The Commissioner Of School Education v. Aided Muslim Committee Primary School
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.03.2025 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR.No.12280 of 2024
1. The Commissioner of School Education O/o. The Commissioner of School Education Department, College Road, Chennai - 6.
2. The Director of Elementary Education O/o. The Director of Elementary Education, D.P.I. Complex, Chennai - 6.
3. The District Educational Officer O/o. The District Educational Officer Cheranmahadevi, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
4. The Block Educational Officer O/o. The Block Educational Officer Ambasamudram Taluk,Tirunelveli District.
...Petitioners
Vs.
Aided Muslim Committee Primary School Rep. By its Correspondent S.Sheik Shajakhan Sithik Vickramasingapuram, Ambasamudram Taluk Tirunelveli District.
...Respondent
1/4
Prayer: Petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 208 days in filing the impugned order dated 23.06.2023 passed in W.A.(MD)No.2119 of 2021.
For the Petitioners :
Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader For the Respondent :
Mr.H.Mohammed Imran
ORDER
(Order of the Court was authored by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) Though this petition is filed to condone the delay of 208 days in filing the review application in Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR.No.12280 of 2024, Mr.H.Mohammed Imran, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, who is the contesting party, has stated that subsequent to the orders passed by this Court, which is sought to be reviewed in the main review application, the orders have been complied with by the State/Department of Education, where, the appointment of the teacher, having been considered, was approved by the order dated 18.12.2024.
2. This factum is not disputed by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners also.
3. When that being the factual matrix, where the orders passed by this Court in the writ appeal in W.A.(MD)No.2119 of 2021 since has been complied with, no need arises for taking up the review application and therefore, by accepting the present 2/4
condone delay petition, the review application in Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR.No.12280 of 2024 stands dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Registry is directed to give a regular number to the review application, i.e., to Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR.No.12280 of 2024.
sd/- 04/03/2025 / TRUE COPY / /04/2025 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.-I/ II /III/ IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
drm TO
1. The Commissioner of School Education O/o. The Commissioner of School Education Department, College Road, Chennai - 6.
2. The Director of Elementary Education O/o. The Director of Elementary Education, D.P.I. Complex, Chennai - 6.
3. The District Educational Officer O/o. The District Educational Officer, Cheranmahadevi, Ambasamudram Taluk Tirunelveli District.
4. The Block Educational Officer O/o. The Block Educational Officer, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.
ORDER
IN CMP(MD) No.2609 of 2024 in Rev.Aplc.(MD)SR.No.12280 of 2024 Date :04/03/2025 3/4
NBF/SAR/ (22/04/2025) 4P/5C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023 4/4