Senthil Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Third day of February Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.3161 of 2015 SENTHIL KUMAR ..PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOVILPATTI EAST POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CR. NO. 65/2015.

..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.K.SEEMARAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.01.2015, for the offence punishable under Section 324 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code, in Crime No.65 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against this petitioner.

3. Considering the facts and the injured has already been discharged from hospital and that the petitioner has no previous antecedent, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Kovilpatti and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 06.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor whether the petitioner is complying with the order or not. sd/- 23/02/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KOVILPATTI, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOVILPATTI EAST POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI. +1. CC to M/S.K.SEEMARAJ Advocate SR.No.8053 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3161 of 2015 Date :23/02/2015 PBK 25/02/2015 ::2P-7C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/