← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/321/2015ordered

Sakthimurugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-01-09Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Ninth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.321 of 2015 1 SAKTHIMURUGAN 2 ANNAMALAI 3 KARTHICK ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED A1,A3 & A4 Vs STATE.REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOTTIYAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CR.NO.9/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SESUBALAN RAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.9 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that injured has been discharged from the hospital and there is no previous case as against the petitioners.

3. Considering the facts and the injured has already been discharged from hospital and that the petitioners have no previous antecedent, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Murisi, Trichy District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further

condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall stay at Karur and report before the Karur Pasupathipalayam Police Station, twice a day at 10:30 in the morning and 06:30 in the evening for a period of one week and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 09/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUSIRI,TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THOTTIYAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, KARUR PASUPATHIPALAYAM POLICE STATION,KARUR.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.P.SESUBALAN RAJA Advocate SR.No.1087

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.321 of 2015 Date :09/01/2015 PA/13.01.15/2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/