Jeyavel @ Jeyavelan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Palanichettypatti
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 10.02.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Jeyavel @ Jeyavelan ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Inspector of Police, P.C.Patti Police Station, Theni District.
(Crime No.24 of 2026) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran For Respondent : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.24 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.
1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 296(B), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 351(3) BNS and 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.24 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons had teased the wife of the defacto complainant and the same was questioned by him. Further, the petitioner along with other accused persons had abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked the defacto complainant and one selvakumar with iron rod, due to which, they sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is a Watchman in the Madhumathi Herbal and Yoga Hospital, he was falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by 2/6
this Court and he is in judicial custody from 09.01.2026. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that there are no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (JM), Theni, and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book 3/6
to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.
(S S Y J) 10.02.2026 msrm 4/6
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court (JM), Theni.
2. The Superintendent, Central Jail, Theni.
3. The Inspector of Police, P.C.Patti Police Station, Theni District.
4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
S.SRIMATHY,J.
msrm
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.2590 of 2026 Date : 10.02.2026 6/6