B. Kesavapandian, v. R.C.Diocese Of Madurai,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 24.02.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR and CMP(MD).No.2345 of 2026 R.Kesavapandian ... Petitioner Vs R.C.Diocese of Madurai, through its Procurator, Archbishop's House, K.Pudur, Madurai - 625 007.

... Respondents PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 08.11.2024 passed in RLTA No.3 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Rent Tribunal Court (Principal District Court), Dindigul, reversing the Fair and Ex order passed in RLTOP No. 3 of 2021 on the file of the Rent Controller, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District dated 10.03.2023.

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Ezhilarasu

ORDER

This civil revision petition has been filed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 08.11.2024 passed in RLTA No.3 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Rent Tribunal Court (Principal District Court), Dindigul, reversing the Fair and Ex order passed in RLTOP No.3 of 2021 on the file of the Rent 1/4

Controller, Nilakkottai, Dindigul District dated 10.03.2023. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondent and perused the records.

3. The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the tenant. The first appellate Court had taken into consideration the order passed in RLTOP No. 3 of 2021, whereby the revision petitioner was permitted to continue to be in possession of the premises. However, in the appeal in RLTA No. 3 of 2023, the appellate Court set aside the order passed in RLTOP No. 3 of 2021 and directed the petitioner to vacate the premises and hand over vacant possession to the respondent/landlord within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The said order was passed by the Rent Controller on 10.03.2023 and the order was passed by the appellate Court on 08.11.2024 reversing the order passed by the Rent Controller. Hence, this revision has been filed by the tenant to set aside the appellate Court order. 4.This court finds no infirmity in the order passed by the appellate Court and also finds no merits to interfere with the order. The order passed by the appellate court is liable to confirmed.

2/4

5.Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Speaking : Yes / No 24.02.2026 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No TM To 1.The Principal Rent Tribunal Court (Principal District Court), Dindigul. 2.The District Munsif, Nilakottai. (Rent Controller). 3.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

TM 24.02.2026 4/4