← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3469/2020dismissed

Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-03-03Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03/03/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN CRL OP(MD). No.3469 of 2020 Raja ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Keeranur Police Station Pudukottai District (Crime No.21 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.C.Ramesh,Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Anandharaj, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.21 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner herein seeks bail since he was arrested in Crime No.21 of 2020 by the respondent police for the offence under Sections 147,148 and 302 of IPC.

2. The case of prosecution is that the accused persons to take revenge of the double murder of Veerachamy and his and son Muthu, has killed Krishnamoorthy who is one of the accused in the Veerachamy and Muthu double murder case. In the First Information Report, 18 persons were named. The name of the petitioner is not mentioned in the First Information Report. However based on the coaccused confession this petitioner has been implicated as one of the accused.

3. The petitioner herein contended that he is innocent and working at vegetable shop in Madurai and he has nothing to do with the alleged murder of Krishnamoorthy. Further he also contended that his name was not figured in the First Information Report and similarly placed accused by name Kannan was granted bail by this court in Crl.O.P(MD) No.3371 of 2020 on 28.02.2020.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposing the bail petition would submit that due to rivalry between two group, the present incident had happened as a retaliation of the double murder occurred last year. Out of 28 accused 9 persons are still at large and if the petitioner is released on bail investigation will get https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

hampered and it will be difficult for the respondent police to secure the other remaining accused.

5. Taking note of the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the chain of crime causing threat to the public cannot be viewed lightly. Moreso, when few of the accused still at large, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Hence this bail petition stands dismissed. sd/- 03/03/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KEERANUR POLICE STATION PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT 2 THE SUPERINTENDENT,CENTRAL PRISON, PUDUKOTTAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3469 of 2020 Date :03/03/2020 AAV SMA/SKN/SAR-I/06/03/2020/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/