Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/350/2015closed

R. Manjula v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-04-06Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Sixth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) Nos.350, 356 and 386 of 2015 R.MANJULA ... PETITIONER IN ALL THE PETITIONS Vs 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, COURTALLAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.447/2013 ... 1ST RESPONDENT IN ALL THE PETITIONS 2 SIVARAMAN ... 2ND RESPONDENT IN CRL.OP.NO.350/2015 2 MANICKAVASAGAM ... 2ND RESPONDENT IN CRL.OP.NO.356/2015 2 M.RAMANATHAN ... 2ND RESPONDENT IN CRL.OP.NO.386/2015 Petitions praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petitions filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to cancel the bail for the 2nd respondent granted in CR.M.P.Nos.6057/2013 ON 04.12.2013, 6349/2013 on 20.12.2013 and 5877/2013 on 28.11.2013 on the file of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli respectively.

Order: These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.M.SARAVANAN, Advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions and of MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on behalf of the First Respondent in all the petitions and MR.VANCHINATHAN, Advocate for R2 in Crl.O.P.No.350/2015 and the Court made the following order:- These petitions have been filed under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C., to cancel the bail granted to the second respondent in Cr.M.P.Nos. 6349, 6057 and 5877 of 2013 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent in Crl.O.P.No.350 of 2015 and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State. There is no representation for the second respondent in Crl.O.P.Nos.356 and 386 of 2015.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Mr.S.Vanchinathan, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent in Crl.O.P.No.350 of 2015 submitted that the dispute between the defacto complainant and the accused was already settled and FIR was also quashed by this Court under orders in Crl.O.P.No.5318 of 2015 on 27.03.2015.

4. Recording the above submission, these petitions are closed.

sd/- 06/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE, TIRUNELVELI. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, COURTALLAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.SARAVANAN, Advocate SR.No.17038. +1. CC to M/S.R.GANDHI, Advocate SR.No.17051. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.350,356 & 386 of 2015 Date :06/04/2015 msm 08.04.2015 p2/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/