Meenakumari v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.3846 of 2015 MEENAKUMARI ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED No.2 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI SOUTH, MADURAI, CRIME NO.7/2015 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.VENKATESAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.7 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 120(b), 193, 196, 203, 294(b) and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner is now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the State.

3. This Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.3024 of 2015, has granted anticipatory bail to the co-accused by name Bagavathy on 23.02.2015, in which, the entire facts of the case has been discussed. This petitioner is the mother of Bagavathy and mother-in-law of the defacto complainant and this petitioner is also an the same footing as Bagavathy. 4.Considering the above said facts, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Madurai, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 05/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.I, MADURAI.

2 Do - Through THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MADURAI SOUTH, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S.R.VENKATESAN Advocate SR.No.10899. TS/09.03.2015/2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3846 of 2015 Date :05/03/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/