Raman v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.3849 of 2015 RAMAN ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. CR. NO.28/2015. ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.M.MAHARAJA Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.02.2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 406, 420, 506 (i) I.P.C. r/w Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST(PA) Act amended by 1 of 2014 in Crime No.28 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side).
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that there is no previous case as against the petitioner.
3. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that there is no previous case against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant bail to this petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned III Additional District Judge (PCR), Madurai and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
(e)The Inspector of Police concerned, is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) whether the petitioner is complying with the order or not. sd/- 04/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE(PCR), MADURAI. 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE USILAMPATTI TOWN POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S.M.MAHARAJA Advocate SR.No.10340. TS/05.03.2015/2P-6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.3849 of 2015 Date :04/03/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/