Madras High CourtWP(MD)/5297/2018disposed of

M.Babu, v. The Superintendent Of Police

2018-03-14Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.03.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM W.P.(MD)No.5297 of 2018 M.Babu ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Puliyankudi Police Station, Puliyankudi, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to grant necessary permission and provide adequate police protection for conducting the Minnoli Kabadi Tournament with speaker boxes schedule to be held from 21.04.2018 at 11.30 pm to 22.04.2018 at 6.00 pm at S.P. Ground, Puliyangudi, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tirunelveli District on the basis of representation dated 09.03.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Indrachithu For Respondents : Mr.B.Bhagawathi, Government Advocate.

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to grant permission and to provide police protection for conducting the Minnoli Kabadi Tournament from 21.04.2018 at 11.30 pm., to 22.04.2018 at 06.00 pm., at S.P. Ground, Puliyangudi, Kadaiyanallur Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

2.Heard Mr.T.Indrachithu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.B.Bhagawathi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

3.The learned Government Advocate has submitted that the ground, which is mentioned in the petition belongs to Public Works Department and without getting permission from Public Work Department, the petitioner cannot seek police protection and hence, he opposes this petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Considering the aforesaid submission, the petitioner is directed to choose some other place and submit a fresh representation before the second respondent and on submitting such representation, the second respondent has to consider and pass appropriate order on merits and in accordance with law. At the time of passing order, the second respondent has to keep in mind the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Church of God (Full Gospel) in India Vs. K.K.R, Majestic Colony Welfare Association and Ors, reported in 2001 - 1 - L.W. (Crl.) 233. 5.With the aforesaid observation, this petition is disposed of. No cost.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T&P) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Puliyankudi Police Station, Puliyankudi, Tirunelveli District.

+1CC to Mr.T.Indrachithu, Advocate, SR.No. 55886 W.P.(MD)No.5297 of 2018 14.03.2018 rmk AM/KK/SAR 4/04.04.2018/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/