G.Rajkumar v. Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.4080 of 2015 G.RAJKUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED.A3 Vs INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
(CR. NO. 175/15) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SESUBALAN RAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code, in Crime No.175 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. It is alleged that the petitioner was found in possession of two units of sand.
3. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that there is no previous case as against this petitioner.
4. Considering the fact that the petitioner has no antecedent, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, Madurai District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice a day at 10:30 in the morning and 06:30 in the evening for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
sd/- 06/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3 INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.P.SESUBALAN RAJA Advocate SR.No.10748 NB Sm:09.03.2015:2P/6C:
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.4080 of 2015 Date :06/03/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/