P.Arumugam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.4125 of 2015 1 P.ARUMUGAM 2 A.UMA MAHESHWARI 3 K.DHANALAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED [RANK NOT KNOWN] Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAIYAMPATTI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.100 OF 2015.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.ANAND, Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections (*)294(b), 323, 355 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.100 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police, seek Anticipatory Bail.

2. This is a case in counter and the counter case in Crime Number is 27 of 2015. It is further that no one has been injured in the incident.

3. Considering the above, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manapparai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with one surety, along with ration card, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, daily at 06.30 p.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor whether the petitioners are complying with the order or not.

sd/- 06/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / (*)Amended as per order dated 26.03.2015 and made in MP(MD)No.1/2015 in Crl.OP(MD)No.4125/2015 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT. 2 -DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VAIYAMPATTI POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.ANAND, Advocate SR.No.10859. ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.4125 of 2015 Date :06/03/2015 msm 09.03.2015 p2/6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/