Pradeep v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Ninth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.4211 of 2015 PRADEEP ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KULITHALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. CR. NO.99/2015. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.V.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.99 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b), 341 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., the petitioner is now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) that injured has been discharged from the hospital and that is no previous case against the petitioner.

4. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kulithalai on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioner shall stay at Trichy and report before the Cantonment Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. [b] the petitioner shall give his thumb impression, specimen signature and handwriting.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not. sd/- 09/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KUZLITHALAI.

2.

-DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CANTONMENT POLICE STATION, TRICHY.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KULITHALAI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.V.KANNAN Advocate SR.No. 11521 SR : 12.03.2015 : 2P/7C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4211 of 2015 Date :09/03/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/