Kumar@Sanjay Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Tenth day of March Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.4245 of 2015 KUMAR@SANJAY KUMAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PULIYANGUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGIRI TALUK, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 534 OF 2014) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.INDRACHITHU Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 307 I.P.C. in Crime No. 534 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

3. This is the third anticipatory bail application. Earlier applications were dismissed by this Court by a well considered order. It is the case of the prosecution that on 10.12.2014, the defacto complainant was standing with his daughter and this petitioner and A.1 teased his daughter and when it was questioned, this petitioner has taken a knife and attacked the defacto complainant in his stomach and shoulders and he sustained injuries.

4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and A.1 has been arrested and released on bail.

5. Just because the injured has been discharged from the hospital and A.1 has been arrested and released on bail, this petitioner will not be entitled to the benefit of anticipatory bail. Taking into consideration the nature of the offence and the manner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

in which it has been committed, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 10/03/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PULIYANGUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGIRI TALUK, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.T.INDRACHITHU Advocate SR.No.11460

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4245 of 2015 Date :10/03/2015 AA/12.03.2015/2p- 4c/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/