Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/429/2015ordered

Vannakili v. The Inspector Of Police

2015-01-12Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twelfth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.429 of 2015 VANNAKILI ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALANICHETTIPATTY POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

CR.NO.05/2015 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.RANJITH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.05 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioner is now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that this petitioner along with two other accused had assaulted one Ramasamy and Aandi on 02.01.2015. It is seen that the police have arrested the husband and son of this petitioner and they are in judicial custody. It is represented that the injured has been discharged. Under such circumstances, this petitioner being a lady, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with conditions.

3. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Theni, on her executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 12/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI.

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALANICHETTIPATTY POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S.N.RANJITH Advocate SR.No.1540 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.429 of 2015 Date :12/01/2015 PBK 19/01/2015 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/