Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4308/2015allowed

Esakki Durai v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-03-09Honourable Mr Justice C. T. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.03.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.4308 and 3800 of 2015 In Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4308 of 2015 1.Esakki Durai 2.Y.Karim Sha 3.V.OOyik Kattan 4.M.Esakkipandi 5.Chidambaram .. Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 5 Vs.

1. The State rep. by its The Sub Inspector of Police, Railway Police Station, Thoothukudi (Crime NO.63 of 2014) .. 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.S.Arif Mohammed .. 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the entire records in relating to the Crime No.63 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.

In Crl.O.P.(MD) No.3800 of 2015 1.Esakki Durai 2.Y.Karim Sha 3.V.OOyik Kattan 4.M.Esakkipandi 5.Chidambaram .. Petitioners/Accused Rank not known Vs.

1. The State rep. by its The Sub Inspector of Police, Railway Police Station, Thoothukudi (Crime NO.62 of 2014) .. 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.D.Anthony .. 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the entire records in relating to the Crime No.62 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same in so far as the petitioners are concerned.

In both petitions:

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Angappan For R1 : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) For R2 : Mr.R.Mohana Sundaram C O M M O N O R D E R The cases in Crime Nos. 62 and 63 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent have been registered for the offences under Sections 147, 447, 427 and 294(b) IPC against the petitioners.

2. Presently, a joint memo of compromise dated 27.02.2015 signed by the petitioners and the second respondent/de-facto complainant and also their respective Counsels informs that due to intervention of the friends and elders the petitioners and the second respondent the dispute was settled amicably. Accepting the compromise, the proceedings in Crime Nos.62 and 63 of 2014 on the file of the first respondent shall stand quashed. The compromise memo shall form part of record.

3. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petitions are ordered. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T & P) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar JOINT COMPROMISE MEMO ENCLOSED To 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Railway Police Station, Thoothukudi 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,Madurai.

+2ccs to Mr.M.S.Jeyakarthik, Advocate, in SR. No.11055 & 11056. Crl.O.P.(MD)Nos.4308 and 3800 of 2015 09.03.2015 ses msm 09.04.2015 p2/5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/