Kumaresan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03/03/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Kumaresan ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Jeyamangalam Police Station, Theni District.

(Crime No. 301 of 2021).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Ranjith.N., Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanikkam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.301 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused No.1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Cr.No.301 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the de-facto complainant, due to which, the petitioner and other accused attacked the defacto complainant and others and also threatened them with dire consequences. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioner herein.

1/3

5.Considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner and also the facts that the injured was discharged from the hospital, that except the offence under Section 506(ii) of IPC, all other offences are bailable in nature and that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with certain conditions. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Periyakulam, Theni District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 03/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PERIYAKULAM, THENI DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JEYAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4183 of 2022 Date :03/03/2022 USK/PN/SAR-IV/09.03.2022/3P/5C 3/3