Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10315/2017closed

P.Ponpriya, v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2018-06-25Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.06.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10315 of 2017 P.Ponpriya ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State represent through the Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of D.S.P., Sivakasi Division, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Malli Police Station, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4.Karupasamy ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband Pandiyaraj's life and limb based on the complaint dated 28.07.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karunanidhi For Respondents : Mr.K.K.Ramakrishnan, 1 to 3 Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The petitioner herein made a complaint dated 28.07.2017, to the respondents 1 to 3 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner and her husband Pandiyaraj's life and limb. Since no action was taken on the complaint, this Criminal Original Petition has been filed.

2.According to the petitioner, the petitioner got married to one Pandiaraj on 16.07.2017 at Arulmigu Sri Chinna Kaliamman Thirukovil, Dharapuram, Tirupur District and the marriage was registered before the Sub Registrar Office, Dharapuram. The said marriage was not accepted by the petitioner's family. In the meantime, in search of the petitioner and her husband, the fourth respondent has trespassed into the house of the petitioner's https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

husband. Hence, the petitioner made a complaint dated 28.07.2017 to the respondents 1 to 3 herein. Since, no further action on her complaint, this Criminal Original Petition came to be filed.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor filed a status report of the third respondent before this Court. In Paragraph - 4 of the Status Report, it is stated the said complaint was made during the pendency of the Habeas Corpus Petition. After the closure of the said petition, the petitioner has sent a representation to the respondents, requesting the respondents not to take any action on her representation, as she is living with Pandiaraj without any disturbance from anybody.

4. Therefore, this Court is of the view that there is no necessity to pass any further direction in this Criminal Original Petition. The petitioner is at liberty to approach the respondents for seeking protection, if necessary, in future. 5.Recording the aforesaid submission, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, O/o D.S.P., Sivakasi Division, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Malli Police Station, Srivilliputhur Taluk, Virudhunagar District.

4.Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/S.R.Karunanidhi, Advocate SR.No. 69861 Crl.O.P.(MD) No.10315 of 2017 25.06.2018 pnn JM/SKN RSK/SAR 2/05.07.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/