A.Arumainayagam, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD).Nos.6316 to 6320 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.6169 to 6173 of 2018 A.Arumainayagam
...Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.6316 of 2018
M.Roland Amirtham ...Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.6317 of 2018 J.Moses
...Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.6318 of 2018
M.Miller John
...Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.6319 of 2018
D.Jeyachithra
...Petitioner in W.P.(MD).No.6320 of 2018
Vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Technical Education cum Higher Education(B2), Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The Commissioner, The Directorate of Technical Education,Chennai-600 025.
3. The Director and Chief Implementation Officer, Canada-India Institutional Co-operation Project, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai-600 025.
...Respondents in all WPs.
COMMON PRAYER : Writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent State Government to consider and pass orders forthwith on the petitioners representations to them dated 20.10.2017 seeking to review its order in Letter (D).No.384 (Higher Education (B2) Department) dated 21.11.2016 within a reasonable time as may be fixed by this Court. (In all Writ Petitions) For Petitioner : Mr.T.Cibichakaraborthy for M/s.Isaac Chambers For Respondents : Mrs.S.Srimathy Special Government Pleader *** COMMON ORDER Mrs.S.Srimathy, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
2.By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petitions themselves are taken up for final disposal, at the stage of admission.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3.The petitioners were originally working as Data Entry Operators in Government Polytechnic College in Nagercoil. They were all scheme appointees. The petitioners were ousted after fourteen years of service. The petitioners had also approached this Court and the Hon'ble Division Bench directed the Government to consider the case of the petitioners. Pursuant to the direction given by this Court, the first respondent passed the orders of rejection. The petitioners now want the said orders of rejection to be reviewed. In this regard, the petitioners have given representations on 20.10.2017. The petitioners want the said representations for review of the earlier orders to be considered.
4.Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the first respondent to consider the said representations on merits and pass appropriate orders and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
5.The Writ Petitions are disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To
1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Technical Education cum Higher Education(B2), Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.
2. The Commissioner, The Directorate of Technical Education,Chennai-600 025.
3. The Director and Chief Implementation Officer, Canada-India Institutional Co-operation Project, Directorate of Technical Education, Chennai-600 025.
+1cc to M/s.Isaac Chambers, Sr.No.58311 +1cc to Spl.Government Pleader Sr.No.58406 TSG VB/SV/MMS/SAR3/03/05/2018/2P/6C ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.6316 to 6320 of 2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 23.03.2018