Madras High CourtWP(MD)/635/2018withdrawn dismissed

M.Chinnavar, S/O.Masilamani v. The District Collector

2018-02-01Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.02.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P. (MD) No. 635 of 2018 M.Chinnavar .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2. The District Employment Officer, Office of the Employment Office, Theni District, Theni.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 30.05.2016 and consequently directing the respondents to sponsor the petitioner's name for suitable job vacancies under the Inter-caste priority category.

For petitioner : Mr. R.Manickam For respondents : Mr. M.Jeyakumar Additional Government Pleader ******

O R D E R

*********** Heard the learned Counsel on either side.

2. By consent of both parties, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3. The petitioner belongs to a Schedule Caste community. He has studied only up to 8th standard. He had obtained driving license to operate heavy vehicles. He registered himself with the Employment Exchange on 05.04.2007. The petitioner has married out of his community. The petitioner now wants the Employment Exchange to sponser his name for suitable job vacancies under the inter-caste priority category. He gave a representation in this regard on 30.05.2016. Since it was not yet processed, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.This Court called upon the second respondent to appear in person. It was stated that the petitioner having passed only 8th standard is necessarily bound by the rules relating to age limit. Since the petitioner belongs to Schedule Caste Category, he has been give a relaxation of five years. If the petitioner had been aged below 40 years, he would have been considered. Since he has crossed the age limit, it is not possible to consider the request of the writ petitioner. Therefore there is no merit in this writ petition.

5. This Writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1. The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2. The District Employment Officer, Office of the Employment Office, Theni District, Theni.

+1cc to The Spl. Government Pleader Sr.No.46212 KMI VB/RSK/SAR4/11/07/2018/2P/4C ORDER MADE IN W.P.(MD).No.635 of 2018 01.02.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/