V.Muthupandi v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5570 of 2014 V.MUTHUPANDI ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, USILAMPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CR. NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2014.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S. D. SADIQ RAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANIAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 420, 417, 465, 467, 468, 471, 120(b) of IPC on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The Investigating Officer is present in Court. 3.It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has been settled between the petitioner and the defacto complainant before the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre has also sent a report to that effect.

4.Under such circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Usilampatti, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 06/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I,USILAMPATTI.

2.DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3.THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TALUK POLICE STATION, USILAMPATTI TALUK, MADURAI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S. D. SADIQ RAJA Advocate SR.No.586

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5570 of 2014 Date :06/01/2015 RG.08.01.2015 2P.6C.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/