← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4328/2022ordered

S.Murugan v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2022-03-07Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/03/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR S.Murugan, ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs THE STATE REP BY, The Sub Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

(Crime No. 112 of 2022).

...

Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : MR.P.R.Prithviraj,Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 112 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused No.3, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) IPC, in Cr.No.112 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is doing Pig sales, on 24.02.2022, the petitioner along with other accused went to the defacto complainant's house for purchasing the Pigs, there arose wordy quarrel between them, due to which, the accused persons waylaid the defacto complainant and abused him in filthy language, attacked him and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital.

1/3

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the charges levelled against the petitioner and also the facts that injured was discharged from the hospital and that the counter case in crime No.113 of 2022 is pending against the defacto complainant and party, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Dindigul, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 07/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

DAS Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I DINDIGUL 2 DO-THROUGH :

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDUGAL DISTRICT.

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DINDIGUL TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADRUAI.

+1 CC to M/s.P.R.PRITHVIRAJ, Advocate (SR-1814[I] dated 08/03/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4328 of 2022 Date :07/03/2022 PKP/SBN/SAR-2/10.03.2022/3P/6C 3/3