Senthil @ Senthil Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP(MD). No.3823 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/02/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD). No.3823 of 2020 Senthil @ Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thirumayam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

Crime No.25 of 2020 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.A.Arul Jenifer, Advocate.

For Respondent : Ms.M.Ananthadevi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in crime no.25 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

2. The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 353, 307, 379 of I.P.C., and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act, in Crime No.25 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

3. The petitioner is not having any previous case. The primary allegations are only against A1 who has been detained under Act 14 of 1982. The petitioner was only a heavy vehicle operator.

4. Taking note of the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.3823 of 2020 bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam, Pudukkottai District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C scrupulously.

5. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 28/02/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUMAYAM, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THIRUMAYAM POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.A.ARUN JENIFAR, Advocate ( SR-4640[I] dated 02/03/2020 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3823 of 2020 Date :28/02/2020 MS/VR/SAR-4/04.03.2020/2P.6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2