← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4368/2022ordered

Sakthiraja v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-03-07Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/03/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Sakthiraja ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No.41 of 2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.R.M.SURESH, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.E.ANTONY SAHAYA PRABAHAR, Additional Public Prosecutor.

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.41 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.02.2022 for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC, in Crime No.41 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and snatched away her gold chain. Hence the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the property has been recovered.

5.Considering the above facts and circumstances and also the facts that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 13.02.2022, that the property has been recovered and that the petitioner is not 1/3

having any previous cases for similar offence or property offence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli. (i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m, until further orders;

(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial; (v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. (vi)If the accused / petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 07/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / 07/03/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I TIRUNELVELI.

2/3

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE DISTRICT PRISON, SRIVAIKUNDAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERUMALPURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4368 of 2022 Date :07/03/2022 SA/PN/SAR.3/07.03.2022/3P/6C 3/3