Seetharaman v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Seetharaman ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by, The Inspector of Police, VK Pudur Police Station, Tenkasi District.

2.Maniraj 3.Davidraj ... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of B.N.S.S., 2023, to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.61 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Adithya Vijayalayan For R-1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/5

For R-2 : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar

ORDER

This petition has been filed by the petitioner to call for the records pertaining to the C.C.No.61 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam and quash the same.

2. According to the petitioner, the defacto complainant is known person to the petitioner. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/defacto complainant, the police has registered an FIR in Crime No. 112 of 2023. After investigation filed Final Report and the Trial Court has taken cognizance for the offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Counsels on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.61 of 2024, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court. 2/5

4. Today, the defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and the defacto-complainant represented that they entered into a compromise as the petitioner is known person. A compromise memo, dated 24.01.2025 signed by the parties, is also filed before this Court.

5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

6. Considering the nature of the offences, the relationship between the parties and they have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

7. Recording the said compromise, this petition is allowed and C.C.No.61 of 2024 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam is quashed. The compromise memo, dated 24.01.2025 filed by the parties shall form part of this order.

24.02.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR 3/5

To 1.The Inspector of Police, VK Pudur Police Station, Tenkasi District.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Alangulam.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P.DHANABAL, J.

BTR 24.02.2025 5/5