G.R.Vijaysukumaran v. The Commissioner Of Police
MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.03.2015
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.SELVAM Crl.O.P.Nos.5178, 5181, 5199, 5202, 5203, 5205, 5206, 5215, 5226 and 5227 of 2015 G.R.VIJAYSUKUMARAN ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5178 of 2015 V.LOGANAYAGI ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5181 of 2015 M.SUBRAMANI ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5199 of 2015 UMA ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5202 of 2015 MOHIDEEN BATCHA ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5203 of 2015 PRAKASAM ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5205 of 2015 P.PARVATHY ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5206 of 2015 CHELLATHAI ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5215 of 2015 M.VADIVEL ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5226 of 2015 G.ALAGARSAMY ... PETITIONER in CRL OP(MD) No.5227 of 2015 -VS1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MADURAI 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.S. COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5178 of 2015 1 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MADURAI CITY. 2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5181 of 2015 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THENI DISTRICT, THENI.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THENI POLICE STATION, THENI TALUK, THENI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5199 of 2015 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TUTICORIN DISTRICT, TUTICORIN.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOVILPATTI TUTICORIN DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5202 of 2015 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, VIRUDHUNAGAR.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAPALAYAM NORTH POLICE STATION, RAJAPALAYAM, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5203 of 2015
1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIRUDHYNAGAR DISTRICT.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF NARIKKUDI POLICE CIRCLE, NARIKKUDI VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, A.MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5205 of 2015 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TRICHY DISTRICT, TRICHY.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVERUMBUR TRICHY DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5206 of 2015 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANGULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5215 of 2015 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. 2 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5226 of 2015 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.
2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, AMBATHURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS in CRL OP(MD) No.5227 of 2015 Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5178 of 2015:
To direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case on the complaint given by the petitioner on 27.02.2015 over the accused, on the supervision of 1st Respondent.
Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5181 of 2015:
To issue a direction to the 2nd respondent to register a case against the above said center and guide name Mr.Dr.Francis Densil Raj.V to follow the endorsement statement of issuing Ph.D Grade to the
petitioner the repayment of total expenses amount of Rs.1,48,000/- on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 19.07.2013 and to submit the report before this Court.
Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5199 of 2015:
To direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 06.03.2015. Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5202 of 2015:
To direct the 2nd respondent to register a case as per the complaint of the petitioner dated 29.12.2014 in accordance with law. Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5203 of 2015:
To direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case based on the complaint given by the Petitioner on 14.09.2014 and pass such further or other orders.
Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5205 of 2015:
To direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to instruct 3rd Respondent to register the case on the basis of complaint dated 13.03.2015. Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5206 of 2015:
To direct the respondents to register a case on the complaint dated 20.10.2013 lodged by the petitioner and pass such further or other orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5215 of 2015:
To direct the 2nd respondent to register FIR on the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.03.2015 and take action as per law. Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5226 of 2015:
To direct the respondents to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 04.03.2015 Prayer in CRL OP(MD) No.5227 of 2015:
To issue a direction, directing the 2nd respondent to register a case on petitioners complaint date 12.03.2015, enquire the same and file a final report before the Court concerned.
PETITIONER ADVOCATE IN CRL.OP(MD)NO.5178/2015 :
MR.R.RAMASAMY CRL.OP(MD)NO.5181/2015 :
MR.A.RAJARAM CRL.OP(MD)NOS.5199 & 5226/2015 :
MR.K.SAFAR BADHUSHA CRL.OP(MD)NO.5202/2015 :
MR.J.C.RATHNAVEL PANDIAN CRL.OP(MD)NO.5203/2015 :
MR.T.INDRACHITHU CRL.OP(MD)NO.5205/2015 :
MR.B.SENTHILKUMAR CRL.OP(MD)NO.5206/2015 :
MR.A.CHANDRAKUMAR CRL.OP(MD)NO.5215/2015 :
MR.D.VENKATESH CRL.OP(MD)NO.5227/2015 :
MR.R.SUNDAR FOR RESPONDENTS :
MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN IN ALL CRL.OPS GOVT. ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE)
COMMON ORDER For the past two and a half months, this Court has been passing the following orders on petitions seeking registration of complaint: "By way of an interim order, this Court directs respondent police to peruse the complaint preferred by petitioner herein and register a case if the same informs commission of cognizable offence. In particular instances, respondent police may resort to a petition enquiry which again shall not extend beyond a period of one week. This order is made towards effecting and ensuring compliance with the decision of the Apex Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)]. It is expected that respondent police will follow the dictate of the Apex Court in the aforesaid judgment in letter and spirit and not give room for any further action at the hands of this Court. In the event of respondent police not being in receipt of complaint allegedly preferred before them by petitioner, it would always be open for respondent police to inform such position at the next hearing date.
Post after two weeks."
Despite the same, we note that generally, action of the respondents have been more in the breach than in observance.
2. The matter is one of grave concern. Despite the decision of the Apex Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P.& Others (2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)) and despite the repeated direction of this Court requiring action of respondent police, the respondent police ever so often, are found to conduct themselves with gay abandon.
3. This Court, therefore, directs the respondents to strictly follow the mandate in Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P.& Others (2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)) and register cases without fail, where reading of the complaint informs congnizable offences. Their failure to do so would be actionable in contempt at the hands of the respective petitioners. Respondent Police may also note that if their resorting to conduct of petition enquiry, is seen as a ruse to avoid the registration of a case, the same would be actionable in contempt. We would also add a word in caution that the decision of the Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another reported in (2014) 3 MLJ (Crl) (SC) scrupulously is to be followed. Such decision in paragraph Nos.9, 14 and 15, inform thus: "9.
From a plain reading of the aforesaid provision, it is evident that a person accused of offence punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years with or without fine, cannot be arrested by the police officer only on its satisfaction that such person had committed the offence punishable as aforesaid.
or unless such accused person is arrested, his presence in the court whenever required cannot be ensured. These are the conclusions, which one may reach based on facts. Law mandates the police officer to state the facts and record the reasons in writing which led him to come to a conclusion covered by any of the provisions aforesaid, while making such arrest. Law further requires the police officers to record the reasons in writing for not making the arrest. In pith and core, the police office before arrest must put a question to himself, why arrest? Is it really required? What purpose it will serve? What object it will achieve? It is only after these questions are addressed and one or the other conditions as enumerated above is satisfied, the power of arrest needs to be exercised.
In fine, before arrest first the police officers should have reason to believe on the basis of information and material that the accused has committed the offence. Apart from this, the police officer has to be satisfied further that the arrest is necessary for one or the more purposes envisaged by sub-clauses (a) to (e) of clause (1) of Section 41 of Cr.P.C.
14.Our endeavour in this judgment is to ensure that police officers do not arrest accused unnecessarily and Magistrate do not authorize detention casually and mechanically. In order to ensure what we have observed above, we give the following direction:
(1) All the State Governments to instruct its police officers not to automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A of the IPC is registered but to satisfy themselves about the necessity for arrest under the parameters laid down above flowing from Section 41, Cr.PC;
(2) All police officers be provided with a check list containing specified sub-clauses under Section 41(1)(b) (ii);
(3) The police officer shall forward the check list duly filed and furnish the reasons and materials which necessitated the arrest, while forwarding/producing the accused before the Magistrate for further detention;
(4) The Magistrate while authorising detention of the accused shall peruse the report furnished by the police officer in terms aforesaid and only after recording its satisfaction, the Magistrate will authorise detention;
(5) The decision not to arrest an accused, be forwarded to the Magistrate within two weeks from the date of the institution of the case with a copy to the Magistrate which may be extended by the Superintendent of police of the district for the reasons to be recorded in writing;
(6) Notice of appearance in terms of Section 41A of Cr.PC be served on the accused within two weeks from the date of institution of the case, which may be extended by the Superintendent of Police of the District for the reasons to be recorded in writing;
(7) Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, they shall also be liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before High Court having territorial jurisdiction.
(8) Authorising detention without recording reasons as aforesaid by the judicial Magistrate concerned shall be liable for departmental action by the appropriate High Court.
15.We hasten to add that the directions aforesaid shall not only apply to the cases under Section 498-A of the I.P.C. or Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the case in hand, but also such cases where offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term which may be less than seven years or which may extend to seven years; whether with or without fine.
4. These petitions are ordered as above. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (T&P) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To,
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MADURAI.
2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, S.S. COLONY POLICE STATION, MADURAI. 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.PUDUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI. 4 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THENI DISTRICT, THENI. 5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THENI POLICE STATION, THENI TALUK, THENI DISTRICT. 6 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TUTICORIN DISTRICT, TUTICORIN. 7 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, KOVILPATTI TUTICORIN DISTRICT.
8 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT, VIRUDHUNAGAR.
9 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAPALAYAM NORTH POLICE STATION, RAJAPALAYAM,VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 10 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, OFFICE OF NARIKKUDI POLICE CIRCLE, NARIKKUDI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 11 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, A.MUKKULAM POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 12 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TRICHY DISTRICT, TRICHY. 13 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUVERUMBUR, TRICHY DISTRICT. 14 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 15 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALANGULAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 16 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. 17 THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
18 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ANNAVASAL POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT. 19 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, DINDIGUL, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 20 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBATHURAI POLICE STATION, AMBATHURAI, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 21 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1CC TO MR.T.INDRACHITHU, ADVOCATE IN SR : 14488 +1CC TO MR.A.RAJARAM, ADVOCATE IN SR : 13839 Ses SR : 13.04.2015 : 7p/24c Crl.O.P.Nos.5178, 5181, 5199, 5202, 5203, 5205, 5206, 5215, 5226 and 5227 of 2015 23.03.2015