Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/531/2015ordered

T. Karthick v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2015-01-29Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Ninth day of January Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.531 of 2015 T.KARTHICK ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY.

CIRME NO.96 OF 2015 ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.C.JEYAPRAKASH Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for an alleged offence punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506 (ii) of IPC in Crime No.96 of 2015, seek anticipatory bail. 2.Initially, the case was at the stage "Crime No=Not known". This Court granted Interim Anticipatory Bail on 13.01.2015 for a period of two weeks.

3.Today, the respondent Police is present and they represent that a case in Crime No.96 of 2015 has been registered against the petitioner on 21.01.2015 for the offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC. 4.Considering the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that no one is injured and no previous case is pending, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 29/01/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI.

2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY. +1. CC to M/S.C.JEYAPRAKASH Advocate SR.No.4018 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.531 of 2015 Date :29/01/2015 PBK 30/01/2015 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/