Viyagappan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fourth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.5179 of 2018 1 VIYAGAPPAN 2 AMALI @ AMALA ARPUTHAM 3 SILUVAI PRAKASH @ YOBU SILUVAI PRAKASH 4 ANTHONY RAJA 5 SELVAN @ ANTHONY SELVAN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 5 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT (CR.NO. 69/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners / accused Nos.1 to 5 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 324, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, on the file of the respondent police and they seek anticipatory bail.

2.Due to previous enmity between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, a wordy altercation arose between both of them. The petitioners threatened the defacto complainant and scolded him using filthy language. Therefore, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint and the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.69 of 2018, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Sathankulam Police Station, Thoothukudi District.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the defacto complainant had suffered only

simple injury.

5.Considering these aspects, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two common sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 04/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATHANKULAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATHANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.R.PON KARTHIKEYAN Advocate SR.No.5374 TSG JAM/10/04/2018/ PN / SAR 3 / 2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5179 of 2018 Date :04/04/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/