B.Chandrasekaran, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Third day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.5072 of 2018 1 B.CHANDRASEKARAN 2 C.ANJALI 3 B.PATCHIAMMAL ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNALAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

(CR.NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.A.DEVARAJU Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused with rank not known, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 294(b), 506(1) of I.P.C and Section 4 of the Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002, in Crime No.138 of 2018, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.Due to some land dispute there was a quarrel between the defacto complainant and the petitioners. The petitioners are said to have attacked the defacto complainant. Therefore, the defacto complainant lodged a complaint and the respondent police registered a case in Crime No.138 of 2018, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Chinnalampatti Police Station, Dindigul District. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any of the offences as alleged by the prosecution. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the State.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Dindigul District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 03/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.III, DINDIGUL 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDCIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHINNALAMPATTI POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.DEVARAJU Advocate SR.No.5311

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5072 of 2018 Date :03/04/2018 PK/RR-CSL/SAR-3/09.04.2018 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/