Pandeeswaran v. The State Of Tamilnadu
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.4213 and 4217 of 2021 Pandeeswaran S/o.Paulraj, 6th Ward Kirama Savadi, Santhaipettai Usilampatti Taluk, Usilampatti, Madurai-625 009.
... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of TamilNadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director, Most Backward Class & Minority Welfare Department, (Kallar Reclamation), Ezhilagam, Chennai.
3.The Joint Director, Kallar Reclamation Department, Old Ramanathapuram Collectorate Campus, Madurai-625 020.
...Respondents
1/5
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings of the third respondent relating to the order of promotion vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.H10/24601/2020, dated 06.11.2020 and quash the same and direct the third respondent to give all service and monetary benefits including increments, promotion by fixing original seniority from the date of appointment of the petitioner. For Petitioner : Pandeeswaran Party-in-person For Respondents : Mr.P.Thambidurai Government Advocate
ORDER
1.
This Writ Petition has been filed under the Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the impugned proceedings of the third 2/5
respondent relating to the order of promotion vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.H10/24601/2020, dated 06.11.2020 and quash the same and direct the third respondent to give all service and monetary benefits including increments, promotion by fixing original seniority from the date of appointment of the petitioner. 2.
When the matter was taken up for hearing, Pandeeswaran, appeared party-in-person and submitted that the he does not wish to press the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition. 3.
Mr.P.Thambidurai, learned Government Advocate for the Respondents stated that he had no objection.
4.
In view of the submissions and the endorsement made by the petitioner, who is appeared party-in-person, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim Order, if any, stands vacated and the file is consigned to record. Consequently, connected 3/5
miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
20.08.2025 Index:Yes/No Web:Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking vsg To:
1.The State of TamilNadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, St. George Fort, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Director, Most Backward Class & Minority Welfare Department, (Kallar Reclamation), Ezhilagam, Chennai.
3.The Joint Director, Kallar Reclamation Department, Old Ramanathapuram Collectorate Campus, Madurai-625 020.
4/5
SHAMIM AHMED , J.
vsg 20.08.2025 5/5