R.Ramar v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.09.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6555 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 R.Ramar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, M.Pudhupatti Police Station, M.Pudhupatti, Virudhunagar District.

..Respondents PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the respondents to give adequate police protection to the petitioner based on the representation made by the petitioner on 31.03.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sathish For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekar, APP

O R D E R

This direction petition is filed to give adequate police protection to the petitioner based on his representation 31.03.2014. 2.The petitioner seeks police protection through his complaint dated 31.03.2014. Now, 4-1/2 years have been lapsed and hence, due to the lapse of period, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted now.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.In view of the same, this criminal original petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

SD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ( CO ) TRUE COPY SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ( CS II ) Arul To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Inspector of Police, M.Pudhupatti Police Station, M.Pudhupatti, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

1CC TO MR. POLEX LEGAL SOLUTIONS, ADVOCATES SR 84003 NM RSK SAR 2 5 10 2018.

2P 5C Crl.O.P.(MD).No.6555 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.1 of 2014 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/