S.Soundaraj Perumal @ Vinothkumar v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL OP(MD). No.4041 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 04/03/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN CRL OP(MD). No.4041 of 2020 1.S.Soundaraj Perumal @ VinothKumar 2.A.Lakshmi ... Petitioners/Rank not known Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Koodakovil Police Station, Madurai District.

Crime No.Not Known of 2020 ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.Y.Krishnan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime No.Not known of 2020 on the file of the Respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 498 (A), 294(b), 323 and 506 (ii) of I.P.C. and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Woman Harassment Act.

2. It is a matrimonial dispute. The de facto complainant and the first petitioner have agreed to live together in the proceedings before the Family Court, Madurai, initiated by the respondent for restitution of conjugal rights. However, when the de facto complainant had gone to the house of the petitioners, she was not treated well and she was again harassed, demanded dowry and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.4041 of 2020 physically assaulted. Hence, a complaint has been given by his wife against the petitioners on 01.03.2020. The second petitioner is the mother of first petitioner.

3. The first petitioner herein, who is working in CRPF has attended the enquiry once and thereafter, he has not participated in the enquiry, whereas, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the first petitioner received a message from the respondent Police that the parties have to work out their remedies before the Judicial Court. Hence, the first petitioner did not attend the enquiry.

4. The first petitioner, who is working in CRPF had made a false promise to take up the de facto complainant, but, when she went to her matrimonial home, she was brutally attacked, which laid to this complaint. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. This Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed accordingly.

sd/- 04/03/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOODAKOVIL POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.Y.KRISHNAN Advocate SR.No.4758

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4041 of 2020 Date :04/03/2020 TK/JC/SAR.2/09.03.2020/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2