← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/11532/2019withdrawn dismissed

V.Simeon v. The Union Of India,

2019-05-08Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan,Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.05.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P(MD)No.11532 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8797 of 2019 V.Simeon ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Union of India, Assistant Director General (GDS/PCC), Ministry of Communication, Department of Posts, DakBhavan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 1.

2.The Chief Post Master General, Chennai.

3.The Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Kanyakumari Division, Nagercoil - 629 001.

4.The Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, Thucklay Sub Division, Thucklay, Kanyakumari District.

5.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, Represented by its Registrar, City Civil Court Building, High Court, Chennai .

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the fifth respondent viz.Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A./310/00562/2019 dated 25.04.2019 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to appoint/absorb the petitioner in any one of the GDS posts proposed to be filled by the present Notification NO. STC /12-GDSONLINE/2019 dated at Chennai 10.03.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

under the 4% Physically Handicapped Quota pursuant to the directions of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench in O.A.No.81 of 2012 and O.A.No.1446 of 2013, dated 16.03.2019 and notification of the first respondent No.17.08.2017-GDS, dated 21.06.2017 with all consequential benefits including pay, seniority and other benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Vijayshankar For R1 to R4 : Mr.K.Prabhu

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by M.DHANDAPANI., J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. Sd/- Vacation Officer // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) +1cc to Mr.V.KARTHIKEYAN, Advocate, SR.No.65300 +1cc to Mr.K.PRABHU,Advocate, SR.No.65312 W.P(MD)No.11532 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.8797 of 2019 ARUL KK/SAR/17.05.2019/ 2P- 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/