← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/528/2025closed

G.Ravi v. Dr. Arul Sundaresh Kumar

2025-04-07Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 07.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Cont.P.(MD)No.528 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.19839 of 2024 G.Ravi

...Petitioner/Petitioner

Vs Dr.Arul Sundaresh Kumar, The Dean, Madurai Medical College, Madurai.

...Contemnor/2nd Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnor for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in WP(MD)No.19839 of 2024, dated 19.08.2024.

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Kirubakaran for M/s.B.Saravanan Associates For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinodh Government Advocate * * * * * 1/4

ORDER

The present contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order of this Court, dated 19.08.2024, made in W.P(MD)No.19839 of 2024. 2.A perusal of the order passed by this Court reveals that the petitioner has challenged a show cause notice issued by the second respondent on 23.07.2024, why a sum of Rs.5,94,962/- cannot be recovered from his DCRG. This Court has not entertained the writ petition and has directed the petitioner to file his objections. The second respondent was directed to consider his objection and pass orders on merits.

3.The petitioner has submitted his objections on 28.09.2024 and 25.11.2024. Without considering his objection, recovery has been made from the D.C.R.G. of the writ petitioner in October 2024. Thereafter, the petitioner has sent another representation on 25.11.2024. The second respondent has passed another order on 07.12.2024, and a subsequent order on 18.03.2025. 4.A perusal of the order passed by the second respondent on 28.10.2024, 07.12.2024 and 18.03.2025 reveal that the order of this Court, dated 19.08.2024, has not been complied with. Without considering the objection 2/4

raised by the writ petitioner, those orders have been passed by the respondent. When this was pointed out to the authorities, they have chosen to pass a fresh order on 04.04.2025, after referring to the orders of this Court and explanation submitted by the writ petitioner. Now it is the grievance of the writ petitioner that even in the order dated 04.04.2025, the explanation of the writ petitioner has not been properly considered.

5.Considering the above said facts, the order having been passed on 04.04.2025, the Contempt Petition stands closed with liberty to challenge the order dated 04.04.2025. In view of the fact that the order, dated 28.10.2024, 07.12.2024 and 18.03.2025, have been passed in violation of the order of this Court, these orders need not be challenged by the writ petitioner. 6.With the above said observations, this Contempt Petition stands closed. 07.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR To The Dean, Madurai Medical College, Madurai.

3/4

R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

RJR Cont.P.(MD)No.528 of 2025 in W.P.(MD)No.19839 of 2024 07.04.2025 4/4