R.Eswaran v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Nineteenth day of September Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.M.BASHEER AHAMED CRL OP(MD) No.12158 of 2017 R.ESWARAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CUMBUM SOUTH POLICE STATION CUMBUM, THENI DISTRICT, CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2017... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.G.KARUPPASAMY PANDIYAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.RAMAR, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC., in Crime No. Not Known of 2017, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent states that no petition enquiry or FIR is pending, as against the petitioner and therefore, the alleged threat of arrest or harassment, as stated by the petitioner herein, is not true. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4.Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, at this stage. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. sd/- 19/09/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
VSA TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CUMBUM SOUTH POLICE STATION, CUMBUM, THENI DISTRICT 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.G.KARUPPASAMY PANDIYAN Advocate SR.No.31034 GJM/RR/BS/SAR-I-22.9.17-2P-4C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.12158 of 2017 Date :19/09/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/