Tamizh Pandi v. The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 4440 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.03.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 4440 of 2020 Tamizh Pandi ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs.

1. State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, B1, Melur police station, Madurai District.

(Crime No.93 of 2016) ... 1st Respondent/Complainant

2. Amsavalli ... 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records pertaining to the FIR in Crime No.93 of 2016 dated 04.02.2016 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same as illegal.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Malathi For R-1 : Mr.A.Robinson, Government Advocate(Crl. Side).

* * *

O R D E R

The second respondent is the complainant in Crime No.93 of 2016 registered on the file of the Inspector of Police, B1 Melur police station, Madurai District. The petitioner is none other the husband of the defacto complainant. To quash the same, this criminal original petition has been filed.

2. The defacto complainant Amsavalli is present in person before me. She states that she is living with the petitioner only. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No. 4440 of 2020

3. Since the parties had reunited, there is no purpose in keeping the impugned First Information Report alive. Since the defacto complainant has no objection for quashing the impugned First Information Report, the same stands quashed. The criminal original petition stands allowed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Record) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) pmu To

1. The Inspector of Police, B1, Melur police station, Madurai District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4440 of 2020 12.03.2020 SM/(08.05.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2