Ashok Rose v. G.Yesudhas

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.8841 and 8842 of 2025 Ashok Rose ... Appellant Vs.

1.G.Yesudhas 2.The Tahsildar Kalkulam, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Deputy Tahsildar, Padmanabhapuram A Region, Kanyakumari District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, to allow the writ appeal by setting aside the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.1921 of 2025 dated 24.01.2025 on the file of this Court. 1/4

For Appellant : Mr.R.Maheswaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Xavier Rajini for R1. Mr.A.Kannan, Addl. Government Pleader for R2 & R3.

JUDGMENT

(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) Heard both sides.

2.Yesudhas / first respondent herein filed W.P.(MD)No.1921 of 2025 seeking issuance of separate patta in favour of his daughter for the petition mentioned property. The learned Single Judge vide order dated 24.01.2025 allowed the writ petition as prayed for. Contending that the said order has been obtained behind his back, this third party writ appeal came to be filed.

3.We are not in a position to grant relief to the appellant for the simple reason that subsequently, in respect of the petition mentioned property, the appellant had executed a deed of release on 24.04.2025. The parties have entered into a compromise amongst themselves. If the 2/4

appellant has any subsisting grievance, it is open to him to workout the same in the manner known to law.

4.In view of the subsequent development, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ appeal. This writ appeal is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. (G.R.S. J.,) & (K.R.S. J.,) 16.07.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias To:

1.The Tahsildar Kalkulam, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Deputy Tahsildar, Padmanabhapuram A Region, Kanyakumari District.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

and K.RAJASEKAR, J.

ias 16.07.2025 4/4