Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6332/2015allowed

Saravanan v. The Inspector O F Police

2015-04-07Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventh day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.6332 of 2015 1 SARAVANAN 2 SHAKTHI 3 SOUNDARI 4 MEENA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.A2 TO A5 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR O F POLICE AMATHUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT, CRIME NO.108/2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.M.KARUNANITHI for M/S.K.J.ASSOCIATES, Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323 I.P.

C r/w Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.108 of 2015 and hence, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution that due to land dispute, the petitioners trespassed into the house of the defacto complainant and threatened the defacto complainant and caused simple injury. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the allegations leveled against the petitioners are false.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the victim sustained simple injury and the victim has been discharged from the hospital.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the State and also perused the entire materials available on record.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Virudhunagar District, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction to the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

7. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 07/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3 THE INSPECTOR O F POLICE AMATHUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.K.J.ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.17470

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6332 of 2015 Date :07/04/2015 PA/08.04.2015/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/