← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4842/2022ordered

Veerakumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-03-15Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15.03.2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR Veerakumar ... Petitioner/ Accused No.1 Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Taluk Police Station, Thanjavur District.

(Crime No.47 of 2022) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Veerapandi Selvaraj, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Sivakumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.47 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 448, 427, 324 and 506(2) IPC, in Crime No.47 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a wordy quarrel between the parties, due to which, the petitioner and other accused abused the defacto complainant and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner and the second accused have filed a petition for anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.1381 of 2022 and this Court has granted anticipatory bail to the second accused and dismissed the petition so far as the petitioner is concerned on the ground that the petitioner is having some previous cases as stated by the prosecution. He Would further submit that the petitioner is having one previous case for the alleged offence under Sections 279 and 337 IPC.

1/3

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner is having one previous case for the said offence.

5.Considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner and also the fact that the petitioner is not having any previous cases for similar or serious offence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 15/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PATTUKOTTAI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PATTUKOTTAI TALUK POLICE STATION, THANJVAUR DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4842 of 2022 Date :15/03/2022 CSM SA/VR/SAR.IV/23.03.2022/3P/5C 3/3