M. Muthuselvam v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Eighth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.6379 of 2015 M. MUTHUSELVAM ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED-1 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIKKAL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT, CRIME NO.15/2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.V.RAJARAJAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is A1 and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.02.2015 for the alleged offence punishable under section 174 of Cr.P.C @ 306, 304(B) and 498(A) of IPC, in Crime No.15 of 2015, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons have demanded dowry, which led to self-immolation by the victim. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner and the victim fell in love with each other and got married on 13.04.2014 and due to some depression, she committed suicide and the RDO report would reveal that there is no dowry harassment.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the major portion of the investigation is over and as per the report of the RDO, there is no dowry harassment. He further submitted that A2 and A3 were arrested and released on bail by this court.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Muthukulathur, Ramanathapuram District and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders.

sd/- 08/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MUTHUKULATHUR 2 -DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SIKKAL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, RAMANATHAPURAM, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 5 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI Advocate SR.No.17600

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6379 of 2015 Date :08/04/2015 NA/08/04/2015/P2/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/