Arockiyasamy v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27/02/2023 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
1. Arockiyasamy
2. Arockiyarani
3. Abishek
4. Loorthamal ... Petitioners Vs The Inspector of Police, Thevaram Police Station, Theni District.
Crime No.28 of 2023..
... Respondent For Petitioners : M/s.Manickam R, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.28 of 2023 on the file of the Respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners/Accused, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 324, 506(ii) of I.P.C, in Crime No.28 of 2023, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that on 12.02.2023, the accused persons abused the 1/3
defacto complainant with filthy language, assaulted him with hands and also criminally intimidated the defacto complainant with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and a false case was foisted against them, due to pathway dispute. On the basis of complaint given by the petitioners, a case has been registered in Crime No.27 of 2023 against the defacto complainant. Now, the injured has been discharged from the hospital and the petitioners are not having any previous case at their credit. Hence, prays to release them on anticipatory bail.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that though the petitioners are not having any previous case and the injured has been discharged from the hospital, the accused persons were abused and assaulted the defacto complainant. Hence, prays to dismiss the petition.
5.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the case and case in counter pending against the parties, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. 7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Bodinayakanur, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10:30 a.m., until further orders; (c)the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law, as if the 2/3
conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;
(f)if the accused/ petitioners thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
sd/- 27/02/2023 / TRUE COPY / /03/2023 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
pnm TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BODINAYAKANUR.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI.
3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THEVARAM POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.3729 of 2023 Date :27/02/2023 RK(NA)/SAR-3(10/03/2023) 3P/5C 3/3