Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Ninth day of April Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.5503 of 2018 1 PANDIAN 2 RAMACHANDRAN 3 NAGADEVI 4 RANJITHKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 Vs THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

IN CR.NO. 273/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/ accused Nos.1 to 4 apprehend arrest at the hands of the the Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 379, 506(i) and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.273 of 2018 and seek anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl Side) appearing for the respondent.

3.The defacto complainant is the wife of the fourth petitioner herein. The allegation against the petitioner is that filthy language was used against the defacto complainant. 4.Considering the nature of allegations made against the petitioners, this court is inclined to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Dindigul and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 09/04/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, DINDIGUL 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TALUK POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.5816

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5503 of 2018 Date :09/04/2018 MKV-CM-VR-RNB/13.4.2018/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/