S.Veeramalai v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.6596 of 2015 1 S.VEERAMALAI 2 V.TAMILSELVI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELAYUTHAMPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.

CR.NO.122 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehend arrest in crime No.122 of 2015 on the file of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 420 and 506(i) of IPC (*)and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition Women Harassment Act, 1998 and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused were running chit company and they have collected money from the bother of the de facto complainant, but failed to repay the amount and thereby cheated. It is further alleged that the accused have obtained blank promissory notes and cheques. When this was questioned, they were threatened by the accused.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the brother of the de facto complainant had borrowed Rs.10 lakhs from the second accused and only to get over from that he filed a false complaint impleading them in this case. It is further submitted that the brother of the de facto complainant had borrowed money from the second accused, for which, they have obtained a blank promissory note and cheque from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ him. The complaint was given by the sister of the de facto compliant, who is a practicing Advocate.

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Karur, and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10 am until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 24/04/2015 (*)Corrected order issued.

/ TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO To be substituted the order copy already despatched on 30/04/2015. 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KARUR.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARUR.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VELAYUTHAMPALAYAM POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1cc to M/S.R.MATHIYALAGAN,Advocate SR.No.21977

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6596 of 2015 Date :24/04/2015 PA/29.04.2015/2P/6C PA/07.05.2015/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/