Eswar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Fifteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice K.KALYANASUNDARAM CRL OP(MD) No.6645 of 2015 ESWAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, IN CR.NO.245 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner is accused apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 170, 420 of I.P.C., r/w. Section 5 of Emblem and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 in Crime No.245 of 2015 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has given advertisement stating that he is a Member of Human Rights Organisation, South Zone.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that the second accused in this case was granted anticipatory bail by the Principal Sessions Court, Dindigul in Cr.M.P.No.559 of 2015 on 13.03.2015.

4. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side).

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Dindigul and on his executing https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m. until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 24/04/2015 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II DINDIGUL 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DINDIGUL TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT +One cc to M/S.P.SUNGUTTARASAN, Advocate, SR.No.22610 RL/6C - 28/4/2015

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6645 of 2015 Date :24/04/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/