← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3903/2021granted

Sivakumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-03-17Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 17/03/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR Sivakumar ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Kallaperambur Police Station, Thanjavur District.

Crime No. 34/2021.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Karunakaran, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.R.Srinivasan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 34 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC r/w 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.34 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was said to have illegally transported half unit of river sand by using Bullock Cart. Hence, a case has been registered. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

1/3

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

6.On perusal of the materials available on records, it is seen that the petitioner has been arrayed as A1, who is the owner of the bullock cart. When A2 and A3 were riding the bullock cart, they were caught hold by the respondent Police and bullock cart was seized. Now A2 and A3 let out on bail. This petitioner is the owner of the bullock cart. The ownership of the bullock cart cannot be proved and there is no registration of ownership of the vehicle. 7.Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner and co-accused were arrested and subsequently, they were released on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 8.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall draw a demand draft in favour of Dean, Thanjavur Medical College Hospital, for a sum of Rs.7,500/- (Rupees Seven Thousand and Five Hundred only) without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court. The petitioner shall produce the proof of remittance /submission of Demand Draft to Dean while executing sureties. On acknowledgment of the same by the Dean, Thanjavur Medical College Hospital, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Thanjavur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

(a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

2/3

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 17/03/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, THANJAVUR.

2.-DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLAPERAMBUR POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO:

THE DEAN, THANJAVUR MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL, THANJAVUR.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.3903 of 2021 Date :17/03/2021 vsg AE/SMA/SAR-IV (22/03/2021) 3P / 6C 3/3