Arputham Anthony v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Seventh day of September Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN CRL OP(MD) No.12889 of 2017 1 ARPUTHAM ANTHONY 2 PACKIAM MATHARASI 3 JEBASTHIRAJA ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 619/2017) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.N.OLI MOHAMMED Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.S.DURAI PANDIAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C., in Crime No.619 of 2017, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are noway connected with the alleged offence, they are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injures was treated as an outpatient and he strongly objected to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also the gravity of offence, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, they are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, on condition that each of the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(i) the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.
(ii) the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
(iii)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(iv) the petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C., scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail would stand dismissed automaticaly.
sd/- 27/09/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
KRK/IA/MSA TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,PARAMAKUDI.
2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PARAMAKUDI TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S.A.ARPUTHARAJ Advocate SR.No.31596 GJM/RR/BS/SAR-2-28.9.17-2P-6C
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.12889 of 2017 Date :27/09/2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/