Kannadasan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the First day of July Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.10192 of 2016 KANNADASAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs THE STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KARIMEDU POLICE STATION MADURAI CR.NO.405/2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S V.BALAJI Advocate For Respondent : P.KANNITHEVAN,M.B.A.,B.L., Government Advocate (Crl.side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as sole accused was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.06.2016 for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 392 r/w. 397, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act in Crime No.405 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner threatened the defacto complainant at knife point and robbed a sum of Rs.200/-. On complaint, a case has been registered for the above said offences.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and his name has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 01.06.2016 and prays for enlarging the petitioner on bail. 4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner is having four previous cases and the investigation of the case is pending.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody from

01.06.2016, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with certain conditions:

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:

(i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.V, Madurai.

(ii)the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 am and 5.30 pm until further orders.

(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

6.The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not. sd/- 01/07/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.V, MADURAI 2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT 3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, MADURAI 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI 5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S V.BALAJI Advocate SR.No.34538 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.10192 of 2016 Date :01/07/2016 trp SH/SK-SKN/SAR-I:01.07.2016:2P/7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/